‘We Felt That It Was Not Humane’: Housing Authority Rescinds ‘Declawing’ Requirement for Residents’ Cats

Print More

Responding to concerns from animal welfare advocates, officials from the New Canaan Housing Authority say they’re moving away from a requirement that residents of affordable rental units at Millport Avenue have their cats “declawed.”

Banned in many countries, declawing typically involves amputating the last bone of each toe on a cat—the equivalent of cutting off each finger at the last knuckle on a person, according to the Humane Society of the United States.

As detailed within an otherwise standard “Pet Addendum” to lease agreements that had been inherited by Stamford-based property manager WinnResidential, the rule required that “cats must be de-clawed and written proof of de-clawing is required.”

When New Canaan-based nonprofit rescue group Strays & Others learned of the policy, representatives reached out to WinnResidential as well as the Housing Authority’s commissioners—and got an immediate and decisive response.

“We were so pleased to hear that the Housing Authority rescinded the policy for the management company, asking that their residents’ cats be declawed,” Strays & Others President Claudia Weber said. “It was the right thing to do.”

The declawing requirement had been a carryover from the Millport Apartments’ prior property manager, officials said. It isn’t clear exactly how many cats were declawed as a result of the policy, but it’s been rescinded effective immediately, according to commissioner Bernard Simpkin.

“We felt that it was not humane,” Simpkin said. “No one here felt that [requiring the declawing] was the right thing to do, and it is going to be removed as soon as possible, and once it is, everyone will be notified.”

Reached by NewCanaanite.com, officials from WinnResidential deferred to the Housing Authority.

The Humane Society is opposed to declawing cats except in rare cases where it’s medically warranted, such as removing cancerous nail bed tumors.

Declawing itself is an unseemly business—typically, a cat’s bone is amputated with a scalpel or “guillotine clipper,” according to the Humane Society, and the wounds are then closed with stitches or surgical glue, the feet bandaged.

“Medical drawbacks to declawing include pain in the paw, infection, tissue necrosis (tissue death), lameness, and back pain,” according to the Humane Society. “Removing claws changes the way a cat’s foot meets the ground and can cause pain similar to wearing an uncomfortable pair of shoes. There can also be a re-growth of improperly removed claws, nerve damage, and bone spurs.”

5 thoughts on “‘We Felt That It Was Not Humane’: Housing Authority Rescinds ‘Declawing’ Requirement for Residents’ Cats

  1. I can’t believe that this was ever a mandate!!! Inhumane and unnecessary! So glad reasonable people have rescinded it!

  2. This is excellent news. I am in the UK where we have never declawed cats. I also have a property which I let and I will allow cats, but not dogs as the property woodwork and walls were badly damaged by a dog, whose claws are much stronger than a cat’s, raking at them when it was confined to a room or just bored.

  3. Very happy to hear this. “The Paw Project” should be required viewing for anyone who still thinks de-clawing is ok.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *